Stick with it because it is going away unless the judiciary breathes a little bit of life into it.
I think that he has handled these hearings in a very gracious way.
It was confusing, inaccurate, and had the effect of misleading those who were not knowledgeable about the program.
I think Judge Gorsuch's dissent is Exhibit A for why we should have Chevron deference.
Do you really think that a Supreme Court that decided Citizens United does not get involved in politics?
Congress can rewrite these laws. Congress can demand disclosure.
What could be more involved in politics than to open this ocean of dark money that flooded into our politics?
Clearly, I mean, just on that alone, it does not even pass the dictionary test. Clearly, there is no independence.
It creates an egregious ethical conflict of interest bordering on wholly improper out-of-court communication with special interest lobbyists...
And Supreme Court Justices socialize with this small group, and then they go and they tender--render decisions that give that small group im...
There is a--it has been I think fairly and fully documented that there is a small group of billionaires who are working very hard to influen...
I was elected to the Senate in 2006. I was sworn in in 2007.
I think you have seen more like 90 percent of the public unhappy with Citizens United because they see the problem that it caused in our dem...
It looks like an interest group has put part of the Federal judiciary in its saddle.
As much as 40 percent of the Federal judiciary has gone to these special-interest-funded training sessions described by one writer as a 'cro...
They set up an array of benign-sounding front groups to both organize and conceal their manipulation of our politics.
And got deeply involved in politics, did they not? They changed the entire political environment, the entire political ecosystem with one de...
the Court made new law, 5-to-4, and each decision predictably helped Republicans win elections.
