And, as a result of that, would you now agree with me that we have a difference, as far as the Russians are concerned, as to what this treat...
I raised, as you recall, the exact same issues with Secretary Clinton and her team. I left there less than satisfied and I'm continuing to--...
In my judgment, it would seem to me that the Russians need to be straightened out on this issue.
I have maintained reservations about the treaty in that regard.
I believe that it is in our interest to do so whether or not we have a treaty, that the administration is committed to do so, and I hope tha...
I'm truly concerned about the rogue countries and our defensive posture, when it comes to incoming from rogue countries, such as North Korea...
I find it stunning... that we have not had a compliance report since 2005.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
It is only the law.
This treaty, in my judgment, marks an important step forward toward safety in a world that is threatened by rogue states and terrorists with...
I respectfully disagree. And I know we're going to have plenty of time for debate on this on the floor.
We've been told that they are--the Russians are involved in a modernization program, and that they're further along than we are.
The issue to me becomes more complex as we go forward and attempt to guard ourselves from an attack from Iran or North Korea.
But, your statement that the treaty does not limit you in that regard isn't true, is it?
we have deep differences with the Russians on what this treaty actually means when it comes to defending ourselves.
Your observation that the United States is the only nuclear power that is not going through modernization, I think, is an important observat...
Modernization is absolutely critical.
We must recognize that the danger of a strategic nuclear conflict with Russia is negligible.
