We are not fostering an environment that is friendly to business.
We have an energy proposal, a policy, and it is called all of the above. We want green jobs. We want wind. We want geoth...
We need clean coal technology. We cannot do it without coal.
Perhaps the green jobs that the Waxman-Markey proponents are referencing aren't actually U.S. jobs, but jobs in China.
Cap-and-trade will not result in net job creation any more than it will result in reduced energy costs.
I think if we go down this path, it is going to be bad. And African-Americans are going to pay, and Hispanics, are going...
We could become energy sufficient in a matter of 1 year if were to open up the opportunities and exploit our own resourc...
I just applaud her for her honesty in response to the question that I asked.
If Brazil does not import a drop of oil in the next 15 years, they are going to be OK.
The bill authorizes an international offsets program that allows our industries covered under the cap, including the man...
Nowhere in that resolution do they endorse in any way any type of a cap-and-trade bill.
the suggestion that the 1 billion ton limit on domestic greenhouse gas offsets that are in the Waxman bill is roughly eq...
There is no debate about this: cap-and-trade will make gasoline more expensive for American consumers.
It is a little bit laughable when people say we want to do something about dependence on the Middle East to run this cou...
We cannot lessen our dependence on foreign oil through taxes, mandates and bureaucracy.
consumers would pay almost $54 billion more annually for gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and other petroleum products.
Costs matter. We should be looking for the cheap, easy way to do this, not for the hard, expensive way to do it.
As to the fact that it does not cost anything, well somebody is going to be paying up to $100 billion a year.
