This truly is a problem that cries out for something to be done.
This kind of price gouging is disgusting to me and, obviously, indefensible.
Revenue has to be on the table.
And if we fail to make the investments, I worry gravely about what that means for our Nation's future.
the economic effects of cuts to nondefense programs could be worse than cuts to Pentagon spending.
Sequester is no way to govern, sequester is a way to fail. We must do better.
my colleagues and I adamantly oppose any unbalanced approach that protects the Pentagon and the wealthiest 2 percent in ...
As far as I'm concerned, a laid-off teacher is just as unemployed as a laid-off defense contractor, and they're both pai...
I think it's really important, Mr. Chairman, that Americans do understand the deeply damaging impact to families and com...
If we exempt defense alone, the entire burden for finding the $1.2 trillion in cuts would fall on, basically, this subco...
If I could just add something, I think it should not come as a surprise to any of us that someone who goes to prison bec...
I always like it when people cite studies and stuff, but I found in my long career here that when you cite a study that'...
There is, I think, a mistaken perception... that IDEA, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, is a Federal man...
I think we both agree that sequestration would be devastating, either on the defense side or the nondefense side.
It's true we both voted against it, but I think I voted against it because it raised no revenue.
I want to point out this concern is also coming from the business community, but it's not just recent.
So you're at the bottom?
I question the usage of your words 'widespread noncompliance.'
