I hope he actually follows through. If he is serious this time, I am committed to working with him and Senator Boxer.
It disturbs a lot of people that Barbara Boxer and Jim Inhofe are good friends.
I really do want to have a robust bill.
a rulemaking consistent with the Clean Water Act and the Supreme Court decisions was critical.
I am not confident that we actually know what the impact on recruiting will be but any decrease will compound our abilit...
A retention drop of 23 percent would be significant.
It is my opinion that this created a perception that the decision had been made from the President on down.
As I see it now, the policy approved in 1993 has worked and I do not see a need to change something that is not impactin...
the panel assessed that repeal of DADT poses a low risk to military effectiveness.
This is not a social thing. This is combat effectiveness. That is what the country pays Marines to do.
According to your report, 30 percent of those who turned in a survey said repealing DADT would have a negative impact on...
Our military is meant for one thing: to fight and win America's wars, not a social science laboratory.
Now is the wrong time to overturn DADT. As U.S. troops remain in the thick of war in Afghanistan, there is risk involved...
if it ain't broke, don't fix it. It has worked. I really believe it has worked.
70 percent of military members think that repeal would have a positive, mixed, or no effect on unit effectiveness.
They said earmarks are a gateway drug that needs to be eliminated in order to demonstrate that we are serious about fisc...
There's just one problem with that. It's not true.
It surprises a lot of people when they hear me say it is good to be back with you, but it is.
