Mr. Secretary, the country is lucky to have your willingness to serve, and we thank you for your service.

How much is in the trust fund at the moment?

So you are continuing to put it in--okay.

I will only take 3 or 4 hours. No problem.

Do you think you will expand that to audio books and podcasts as well eventually?

Rayburn is rated 'poor.' Longworth is rated 'fair.' Presumably we would have to start on Rayburn first because it is deteriorating faster.

the only way they are going to denuclearize is if there is a regime change.

Because, when we went through finishing the CVC, there were insane cost overruns, and it took so much longer than was projected because we are dealing with older buildings.

Today, Kim Jong-un is not his father and I think that is the most important thing that we have to understand.

I see no relinquishing of any of the sanctions.

The bottom line that I want to know is have we enabled there to be transparency absent the waiver of the confidentiality by the person who is the victim?

So why then has the OOC in practice kept the public in the dark about which lawmakers or offices have been accused of improper workplace behaviors?

I want to thank you for the opportunity to testify on behalf of my priorities which are important to northeast Florida.

But you aren't prohibited under the law from doing so, you are choosing not to?

And then is Longworth or Rayburn next?

But before there is a nondisclosure agreement, if there is one, wouldn't it be more transparent to provide settlement information via office rather than suggest--offer that information in the aggregate.

They have come to us and wanted us to come in and help prop up, with private enterprise, their ports and things so the Chinese don't come in and control that area because the Sri Lanka deal was a wake-up call for that entire region.

I would be very reluctant to relax any of those U.N. sanctions because of the great difficulty of putting them back on.