We should choose them all, because we are better off with all of them than with just one of them.
It is a refreshing day when the Administration admits that the law needs more transparency, more state and local involve...
Today we are here to discuss a bipartisan bill that would not only help to clarify jurisdiction and prevent unlawful Fed...
This bill is a testament to the hard work that both sides of the aisle have done in achieving an agreement on a comprehe...
The goal was preventing a species listing that would devastate western economies, which it can because it affects 11 sta...
The purpose of this hearing, as I understand it, is to allow states to tell their remarkable stories.
The new greenhouse gas guidance assumes that any greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global climate change, and are h...
Why are you providing this----
What would be the practical effects of an agency not following the guidance?
Even with the guidance, a non-binding guidance, access to the courts is somehow----
So if a disagreement occurs between agencies about the application of the guidance, would CEQ get involved?
Look, major Federal decisions should be informed by an understanding of how they impact our environment.
This so-called guidance didn't even go through rulemaking, which is astounding when you consider its economic impacts.
But the Council on Environmental Quality's revised draft guidance on greenhouse gas emissions turns NEPA on its head.
That will lead to project delays, project modifications, added project costs, mitigation costs, or even project denials.
The Federal Government needs to follow the lead of State-based utilities and harden the grid against an EMP threat.
I agree with Chairman DeSantis that the Federal Government needs to take the EMP threat seriously by including it in DHS...
That's why I support Congressman Trent Franks' Critical Infrastructure Protection Act.
