So we will be referring those inconsistencies to you today, Mr. Horowitz, and I think that it is important that the American people get to l...
Your independence is key and, certainly, our Councils of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency, also known as CIGIE--we work in ac...
The EPA seems to be intent on weakening Federal protections for coal ash. And that is disappointing.
For the chemicals that we have the toxicological profiles on, yes, those are some of the health concerns that we have identified.
We need improvement in water infrastructure and to pay more attention to monitoring these chemicals.
This action clearly goes against the plain language of the Clean Water Act and creates a glaring loophole which could have disastrous impact...
the allegation that we are not concerned about the environment is just fundamentally false. It is a nice talking point.
What is not being reported is the amazing work of the Office of Water and the Agency and the regional offices every single day.
It is very important we have the opportunity to examine the impact of coal plants and coal ash dumps on groundwater quality.
If it is illegal for me to do that, the States are doing that.
Absolutely. The Clean Water Act has been very, very successful, but there is certainly a lot more work the States and the Federal Government...
It is our responsibility, our obligation, rather than locking that resource into a ground, into the ground and deep water injection and neve...
I didn't want to be the person looking back 10 years from now and saying the EPA missed it.
That is the way Congress set it up.
This country really does need to focus on integrated planning.
I think we need all of the above, local, State, and Federal Government. We all have a role to play.
I think it is absolutely true.
we think about environmental protection every single day.
