Why is judicial review necessary if, in fact, the agency makes a mistake? Congress plays a role in correcting agency mistakes...
Thank you, Chairman Lankford.
Congress needs to take responsibility for clarifying ambiguity in things that are as controversial, I think, as CO2.
When we do not act effectively, we are basically writing a blank check.
Well, I mean, if you take my example of King v. Burwell, if the judiciary decides we are tired of patching this together, what happens?
And the court does not live in a vacuum. I mean, the court understands real world implications of their decisionmaking.
Where the first analysis probably was, who is going to sue us if we do it, right?
I think Congress should play a role in making this determination.
the President is politically accountable for decisions that he makes, maybe not in his second term.
I do want to once again give you a high five for all the great work that is done in North Dakota with constraints on resources and for the e...
Administrator, one of the things I mentioned in my opening statement was making sure that as you work with flood mapping, remapping, and flo...
When will you start that process?
Okay. And you have already taken steps to address the Administrator who was overseeing the program, I understand, correct?
How can we measure that and how effective are the preparedness grants in helping improve that preparedness across the country?
That's it, because, done right, I think it can make a huge cost difference.
So my understanding is there are 144,000 cases or claims that included engineering services.
Lives saved, obviously, that is a huge priority there.
I think one of the challenges we have both on the north and on the south border is, as we have put and deployed more resources at the points...
