I am concerned that instead of actually increasing public involvement and streamlining the planning process, this Planning 2.0 process will ...
I think Planning 2.0 fails in all these categories.
Yes, some may view this as a double standard in that the rules that apply to everybody else do not apply to the BLM.
Decisions about the future of public lands should involve, I believe, the best science, meaningful and ongoing coordination with local stake...
This change would result in plans that do not reflect the on the ground realities and ultimately, will disenfranchise knowledgeable, local a...
I look forward to again working with the senior senator from Massachusetts, Senator Warren, and I hope that all the committee members and wi...
I'm kind of curious if you have any ideas on how we can promote the open MEPs with a range of participants, and, of course, what I'm particu...
On the same topic, is there a conflict, or is the state-run plan able to coexist peacefully with the private sector plans, the small busines...
I will. I'm fascinated by the form.
Unfortunately, the proposed changes will, in my mind, decrease stakeholder involvement at crucial points in the planning process.
We have to be careful with the rules, too, or again we'll discourage the small businesses from looking at it.
I agree with President Obama on this topic and appreciate that he desires to enable employers to take advantage of these open plans.
I believe we need to make retirement plans less complicated, less intimidating, and less expensive for small businesses.
the stakes are too high to rush through these issues without really thorough feedback.
I believe that the vast majority of small business owners across America are just like the ones we serve in Wyoming in that they would like ...
As written, Planning 2.0 will effectively ignore expert knowledge in both local agency offices and among local land users.
I'm going to go ahead and assume that we're going to expand it.
If we go to the open MEPs, will that make the audit easier, then, too, or more difficult?
