I will stipulate that mercury is a poison and a pollutant and SO2 is a pollutant.
The question is, Is it worth the cost?
We could call them the Evaporating Personnel Administration, I guess.
The fact that EPA continues to stand in the way is both inexplicable and unacceptable.
I do find it troubling that Lisa Jackson, once again, is a no-show at a very important hearing.
These threaten our Nation's energy security at a minimum and our economic opportunity for sure.
EPA estimates that 10 gigawatts of coal-fired power will retire rather than install controls.
Some have said that the subtitle C regulation would require disposal in a hazardous-waste landfill. Is that true?
If subtitle C regulation is finalized, what requirements or restrictions on the materials that are beneficially reused--...
The last hearing we had on coal combustion waste was in 2009, and this is the first hearing we have had on coal ash sinc...
I really want to ask, is it--since about 45 percent of coal ash now is used, whether it be minefill for 8 percent or abo...
So right now there is no Federal regulation?
The coal ash rule is a matter of great interest to the subcommittee and to our district.
Coal generates approximately 45 percent of the power in our country.
I would like to welcome not only our witness in the first panel but also our second panel.
I do appreciate that response. I do.
The GAO also said that they were concerned about the lack of comprehensive cost data that the Army used.
The GAO said that when the decision was made to keep two and bring two home, that it would save millions.
