I asked about the length and breadth of the report. He said it was a very substantial report, so substantial that I don't see how you could summarize it in four pages fairly.

I just had a conversation with the attorney general. He said it was a very substantial report.

It is clear that the campaign colluded. And there is a lot of evidence of that.

Instead, his exercise of the pardon power has created the perception that pardons are a political tool, a publicity stunt to curry favor with the public.

Madam President, first, I thank my colleague from Wyoming. Now he knows why I said: ``Bring it on.'' We are finally getting even people like the Senator from Wyoming to admit that climate change is real, that it is caused by human…

Madam President, last night, President Trump's Justice Department issued a letter to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals calling for the elimination of healthcare coverage for tens of millions of Americans. Up until last night, the Trump…

My friend from Wyoming said I said: ``Bring on the vote on the Green New Deal.'' I did, not because I think it is a smart thing to do--it is a stunt--but it will finally get us to talk about climate change, something the other side has not…

Madam President, would my friend from Wyoming, who mentioned my name, yield for a question or three?

Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that we be given 2 minutes so that the Senator from Rhode Island can ask a question of the Senator from Wyoming. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is so ordered.

The process--or processes through which science is conducted, reviewed, or communicated to the public and incorporated into policymaking must be transparent.

scientific integrity is about, in my opinion, ensuring a process and atmosphere in which the science leads us to the results.

The efforts to silence science, distort, and bury or delay the release of valuable science at EPA--and they serve as a reminder of the urgency of passing the Scientific Integrity Act.

I'm extremely concerned by the actions that have suppressed information and kept results hidden from the general public.

I firmly believe that we must ensure that inappropriate political interference in the scientific process does not get in the way of protecting our national security and public health.

this, in my view, demonstrates contempt for diplomacy and diplomats and contempt for the Congress.

Your additional expansion of the Global Gag Rule compromises our ability to support comprehensive, life-saving care to those most in need.

This policy expansion could dramatically impede the effectiveness of our foreign assistance and life-saving programs.

This type of coercion runs contrary to the basic tenets of freedom that our country was founded upon.