
I agree with that assessment. But the Administration's intention to counter that appears to be through bilateral actions.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
65,600+·quotes on file

I agree with that assessment. But the Administration's intention to counter that appears to be through bilateral actions.

But we need to bring other instruments to bear as well, be those economic and in some cases maybe even military, but at the end of the day, we have yet to articulate a deterrence strategy to dissuade, deter, and if need be, compel bad…

When journalists seek and tell the truth, they become the targets of those who reject these values.

Mr. McCaul and I recently reintroduced the Global Fragility Act to promote this approach.

America's role in the world cannot just be about advancing our strategic and material interests.

I feel very strongly that politics should stop at the water's edge.

It just bugs me that we have to do this, right? And what it does is it's additional bureaucracy within my system to account for these bad situations.

I just want to commend you for being willing to relive this moment in order to enact change in our country in recognizing the danger of White supremacy.

I could've covered the insulin costs of a community of 21,400 people for the cost of your price-gouging.

In a single-payer healthcare system, an insulin dose can cost about $137 a vial.

So my question to you is, why should we give you another dime?

What I would ask of the FBI is: Why? What is your reason for what has been termed a lackadaisical attitude?

And I think that has an additional expense, because when you look at, for example, the GOP tax scam, about 60 percent of all of those proceeds went to stock buybacks.

So I need to find a way to build this margin. So let's say I take away healthcare from my workers.

So it is exceedingly common for CEOs of these major corporations to have their pay tied to the stock price.

It is possible that our GDP numbers are going up without any actual value added to our economy, is that correct?

So my question is, how is this different from a pyramid scheme?

And it generally can create a situation where it prioritizes the interest of the shareholders more than the actual consumers of the product, or even the employees of the company.