this has to be bipartisan and I think, if we put ourselves in a position where, you know, one side of the aisle is not happy with what we ar...
The return on investment, we are less than half of a percent of the federal budget, and you look at what we have been able to deliver...
I am the first NASA Administrator from that day to this day that was not alive when that happened.
The inspiration that came from that moment in time was transformational for our Nation and transformational for people that, you know, went ...
There is a lot of continuity here.
It depends what Boeing is willing to invest, quite frankly. We don't have currently the appropriations necessary to achieve that.
My objective is to let everybody know that cannibalizing certain parts of NASA to fund another part of NASA, that is not my goal.
I think it is a very important hearing and timely.
As Representative Aderholt said, if we can't land on the Moon within 5 years, we need to change the organization.
I have been very clear with everybody I have talked to on both sides of the aisle, the goal should be additional resources, not cannibalizin...
I want to thank you for the hearing, and your focus on this issue.
The challenge that we have as a Nation is that, the longer programs go, the more political risk that we have.
If NASA is not currently capable of landing American astronauts on the Moon in 5 years, we need to change the organization, not the mission.
To get to the Moon on schedule, we are going to need to use the SLS rocket.
Well, I think we have pretty good oversight capabilities already.
I think things have gotten measurably better during your tenure.
Oh, it is huge. This, I think, goes to what the chairman was talking about earlier about the tradeoffs.
To be clear, I am confident that, given our current rate of production, we will have three SLSs available and the third one would be for Art...
