I would like to make two final points. The first relates to the timing of all of this.
Our differences with Iran are largely political and can be addressed and resolved by political leaders.
There was no way to stop Iran from seeking missile technology unless we could address Iranian national security concerns...
I believe that military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities would be the height of folly.
I warn, however, in addressing it, not to look at it in isolation.
It's a long ways from here to where we need to end up with Iran. The outcome, at the end of the day, is full restoration...
If you don't have the Ayatollah, the Supreme Leader, engaged with the President of the United States, an agreement on wh...
Our friends and allies need to understand this.
The fact is that the United States must open these talks from a position of strength.
The Obama administration has said that it wants to open direct talks with Iran. This is the right first step, and I appl...
I do not agree with this contention. In fact, I believe we and the Iranians approach each other with a mutual sense of v...
I believe we and Iran are fated to engage one another and that engagement will begin in the next year or so.
The Iranian nuclear pretensions are inherently destabilizing.
I believe there is a negligible chance we can ever get them to accept that, or that we could ever set in motion a debate...
I completely believe that we must be organizing the international community's clear understanding of what this line is o...
I think, in the short term, it's imperative that we make it very clear to the Iranians and to President Ahmadinejad that...
It is important to let the Iranian people see the reasonableness and the attractiveness of what could be theirs.
I believe a negotiation really will need to focus on whether Iran is allowed to have some enrichment activity.
