But we can't and we won't do those things if we don't pass aggressive, forward looking climate and energy legislation.
We need an energy bill that can send clear market signals that both short-term and long-term investment in energy technologies will be rewar...
Killing a Senate bill is not success.
the evidence is now clearer than ever before that a voluntary approach won't get the job done.
Today, we have an opportunity to lead the world in rolling back the urgent threat of climate change.
If we are wrong, we will have created more jobs, become more energy independent...
If it goes over 2 degrees Centigrade, we risk catastrophic changes to the climate, to our crops, to our water supply.
I think as public people we have a responsibility to try to respond.
Almost every study that looks at the costs does not factor in the impact of energy efficiency or the impact of new technology.
The science, Senators, is more definitive than ever. The science is screaming at us to take action.
I believe, and the vast majority, overwhelming numbers of scientists and peer reviewed studies across the globe, leaders of countries across...
Senator Webb (D-Va.) compared it to 'the old Soviet Union.'
Cap-and-trade supporters acknowledge job loss. They acknowledge the transition to a green economy.
S. 1733 is our best insurance against a dangerous future.
There is a reason that the leaders of the G20 in Italy recently affirmed that we cannot let the temperature of the planet rise more than 2 d...
We will create jobs that cannot be exported, because we will create our energy here at home, which makes America stronger and which in fact ...
Today we begin the formal legislative process to lead the world in rolling back the urgent threat of climate change.
I wonder if that applies to the 44 Democrats who voted against Waxman-Markey.
