Not really.
There is a hypocrisy here because the Democrats were pushing Harriet Myers... and they said there's no privilege. They h...
The president ought to go back to where -- his original position, and have her go there and testify or just meet with th...
The president ought to go back to where his original position and have her go there and testify or just meet with the st...
Yes, it's a double standard.
the deployment of a single additional soldier makes all the difference, but a public debate that reduces a difficult mis...
You left us before. Will you do it again? You walked away, you left us holding the problem that you helped to create.
unless we are able to build and transfer leadership to local Afghans, unless the governance and development pieces are i...
We face a range of difficult choices, but the President's plan represents the best way we know to protect our Nation tod...
I am happy to supply whatever support these valuable civilians need. And we need more of them.
Accomplishing this mission and ensuring the safety of the American people will not be easy.
For my part, I remain skeptical about sending more troops to Afghanistan.
A strong, stable, democratic Pakistan must be a key partner for the United States, and an ally in the fight against viol...
The duration of our military presence will be limited, but our civilian commitment must continue even as our troops begi...
The essence of our civil-military plan is to 'clear, hold, build, and transfer.'
The cost to our country--in blood and treasure--has been high in Afghanistan, and the gain insufficient.
Do we have a reliable partner in the Karzai government?
A strategy for success must include narrowly defined, achievable goals like protecting key population centers.
