A ratified New START Treaty would also continue our progress toward broader United States-Russian cooperation.
every previous President who faced this choice has found that the United States is better off with a treaty than without one
We must work together to reduce the nuclear threat.
This treaty marks a significant step forward for both America and Russia, and I think the world.
This treaty improves our security because it increases certainty, stability, and transparency.
we have reached agreement on a strong draft, with the cooperation of both Russia and China
the relationship with Russia is a key part of that kind of security
The treaty does not infringe upon the flexibility we need to maintain our forces.
the choice before us is between this treaty and no treaty governing our nuclear security relationship with Russia
The failure to ratify and move ahead with this will certainly set back the prospects for United States-Russian cooperation.
We must ensure that our nuclear arsenal remains safe, secure, and effective.
I believe our chances of proceeding to reductions on tac nukes would be zero if we do not ratify and put this treaty into force.
Nothing in the New START Treaty constrains our missile defense efforts.
this announcement is as convincing an answer to the efforts undertaken in Tehran, over the last few days, as any we could provide
The Nuclear Posture Review explicitly authorizes reuse, which the laboratories have felt reluctant to use before.
Thus, my professional judgment is that U.S. security would be best served by the Senate providing its advice and consent to ratification.
COPPA has served as an effective safeguard for young consumers under the age of 13 in the online marketing environment.
It is now critically important that the intent of COPPA be fully implemented to protect young people from new commercial practices.
