They changed the name to protect the guilty.
This week, the Republicans have stepped up their assault on clean air and clean energy.
The planet is warming and the weather is worsening.
The Republicans are also waging an all-out war on the Clean Air Act.
But would you change that mandate so that we avoid the moral hazard?
These bills are part of the same Republican agenda that yesterday attempted to push through emergency funding for natural disaster victims a...
If the idea behind this bill is transparency, I would suggest the legislation also require inclusion of the cost of nuclear bailouts on cust...
The Republicans are providing the American people with a false choice.
I don't see it as being any different than Freddie or Fannie, where you create that moral hazard.
We are having 100-year floods every few years. We have had tornados rip through the country, killing people and destroying property.
I appreciate Congressman Bishop's attempt to navigate Congress' clear obligation in this matter with the current realities of a profoundly f...
We can talk about cutting the clean car factory funds.
Actually, I remember reading that Facebook and Google are actually touting all of the green power that they have.
How many people do you really think know they are paying still $500 million on that mistake?
So why isn't building new transmission for wind and solar also a valid public purpose?
Do you believe, Ms. Patton, that it would be good, in terms of attracting investment from large high-tech companies...
If my Republican colleagues are really concerned about disclosing costs to their customers, let me suggest an alternative.
Why not? Why not? Why don't they need the information?
