It reduced our ability to surge resources within our Criminal Branch and meet existing and emerging threats.

You can always get a new gun, but you can't go back and redo technology.

When will SENTINEL be done? I mean, when will you have completed it?

But it's a strain on the FBI to do this?

We've got to protect the American people by making sure the FBI has the right tools, and that's technology.

Chairwoman Mikulski, I would like to conclude by thanking you and this Committee for your service and your support.

if China does not take respectful action in regards to carbon emissions, then it may be appropriate for the United States to take some action.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

the trade imbalance of the United States, internationally, is troublesome.

I think that we need to move forward on this, even if we are the only country in the world to do so, because I think it would be good for our Nation, it would create clean jobs here in America, keep the technology here, and it's important…

I would just point out that Americans would believe that we are already helping China with money, since we have such an imbalance with them.

I'm not sure.

But, if China does not become party to that, then, of course, the mechanisms would not have any impact.

Some would also argue that China has arbitrarily kept its currency low, holding down the wealth of its country, at the cost of the United States.

The key is obviously to have a framework where they're part of the agreement.

I apologize for going over my initial time. I was so excited to be able to ask a question I couldn't contain myself.

The concern that I have is that those numbers are continuing to grow and without a final determination, the resources necessary to deal with that growth are not forthcoming.

I would strongly encourage your agency to focus attention on fixing and improving the efficiency of existing highways and roads over expanding the system.