I would rather have the United States be at that table, and I will bet you if we are at the table within the confines of...
It is by joining the Convention that we can best secure our navigational freedoms and global access for military and com...
Use of diplomacy and the framework provided by the Law of the Sea Convention would facilitate military cooperation in th...
the navigational bill of rights provided for in the treaty... are beneficial to the United States.
By not acceding to the Convention, we forgo the best and strongest legal footing for our actions.
The crucial navigation rights and freedoms that would be 'locked-in' by the United States becoming party to the Law of t...
If the U.S. Senate declines to ratify Law of the Sea, I believe we will be doing the same thing.
Yes. The Law of the Sea Convention provides an internationally recognized legal framework to support our freedom of navi...
calling for ratification of the treaty.
I have been especially critical of President Obama and the State Department for failing to approve the Keystone XL pipel...
The Law of the Sea already forms the basis of maritime law regardless of whether the United States is a party.
U.S. ratification of Law of the Sea would support job creating investment and open new resources to our industries at a ...
Every major ocean industry--including shipping, fishing, telecommunications, oil and natural gas, drilling contractors, ...
By not joining the Law of the Sea, we also are diminishing the potential scope of our domestic energy production.
I am convinced beyond any doubt that joining the other 160 nations that are party to the treaty will protect America's e...
THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY AND STRATEGIC IMPERATIVES FOR RATIFICATION
The hearing will come to order.
I am personally deeply supportive of it, and I believe it is now more urgent than ever that we ratify it because to rema...
