I commend you for asking that 'What is the one take-away?' question from each of these gentlemen.

We need to make sure we get rid of this Swiss cheese approach to regulation.

I just do not want to be here 5 years later looking at what the next round of new products would be and say, 'Why didn't we see that ahead of time?'

This problem we are in the middle of the crisis now of too big to fail.

When we look at this violence that is going on principally along the border--it's not simply along the border and it's not totally because of what the Mexicans are doing, although I certainly would express my appreciation for their taking…

Does it really make sense for the U.S. to continue to allow millions of dollars to go into a French cultural fund every year?

I've had a long concern about the incrementalism with respect to China.

It is my hope that at the very least $75 million will be maintained and we will find other resources to fully fund The Second Chance Act.

I appreciate that the idea of having informed divergent views is very vital to how our decision processes work.

I think there are few people in this country who have developed the expertise that he did early on in his career with respect to Russia.

Performers, too, are creators who deserve and need to be paid.

This is simply not fair.

Why has there not been a more focused effort on making sure that some of these counterparties--you are not even going to tell us who they are--at least take a haircut?

We, the American taxpayer, have taken a high-flying company that was doing what most of us would believe in a normal market circumstance was high risk.

So the vast majority of these counterparties are U.S., not foreign?

But I think what you are also saying--I know my time is up, I apologize, Mr. Chairman--but you are telling us, Congress, go fix this.

And my last--my time is up, but if in just maybe a straight yes or no on whether I am hearing you correctly.

Obviously, I think some on the Committee question that.