The United States Government takes money laundering very seriously.
A bank that launders drug money or terrorists' money can be shut down, and individuals in the bank can be banned from banking.
And who is responsible for making a determination about whether to revoke the charter?
So you just said to the Justice Department, 'You are on your own in figuring this out'?
the U.S. Government takes money laundering very seriously for a very good reason, and it puts very strong penalties in place.
If you are caught with an ounce of cocaine, the chances are good you are going to go to jail.
Well, it is somewhere beyond $881 million of drug money.
What does it take to get you to move toward even a hearing, even considering shutting down banking operations for money laundering?
I wholeheartedly support his presentation of the budget facts as they relate to the impact of the cuts.
The committee needs a budget that will enable us to do our job.
My father always said when two people agree upon absolutely everything, you don't need one of those people.
My constituents on Cape Cod, the Islands of Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard and the South Shore of Massachusetts have strong opinions about ...
I support a plan that combines common sense tax reform with pragmatic spending cuts don't disproportionally affect our middle class families...
I urge the Budget Committee to be weary of shortsighted austerity that will eliminate job-creating initiatives and compromise our safety for...
SNAP is the most effective and most efficient anti-hunger program that we have.
This program has been demonized and diminished in a way that I think is totally unjustified.
I absolutely agree with you. I mean, that is one of the reasons why I have been urging the White House to do a conference on food and nutrit...
But in the short term, it is important that the Administration make it clear that a cut of $16.5 billion is unacceptable.
