
I think that, as we come further to the border, our role is to then help the Mexican military, who is the principal element of the law enforcement effort.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
21,600+·quotes on file

I think that, as we come further to the border, our role is to then help the Mexican military, who is the principal element of the law enforcement effort.

I understand the United States is not, but it's been widely reported that other NATO countries are.

I will be anxious to see it, but it would still seem to me that, at least in this area on reinsurance, because of the national and international nature of reinsurance, that a national standard amongst States.

But that again presupposes that you at the State level are going to better be able to assess that national or international reinsurer's ability to pay off that risk than a Federal regulator, doesn't it?

I want to go back to where Senator Corker was heading in trying to understand--I think I have got the frame of the challenge between the State versus the Federal regulation framing.

I think, at least in recent press reports, we are still waiting for the Treasury to give some guidance in this area.

The fact of the matter is we are already paying.

Which is always less efficient. So it's quite significant, the reduction in net output for adding CCS.

I have a state like the Chairman's and I understand Senator Thune asked some questions on this subject, as well.

There have been incentives proposed, both in the House and Senate as part of most climate packages.

I would strongly urge--and I for one think in the area of Appalachia that basically developed coal, that powered our economy in the 20th Century, sure would be great if we had a couple of demonstration projects on how we're to be able to…

I think you raised a very valid point with Mr. Alix, which is if we're on the cusp of an influction point, why don't the traditional incumbent industries get it?

There has not been a cross-brand, you know, really professionally-driven non-governmental approach to this and I think it's a wonderful opportunity.

I'd like you to comment generally about the approach we're taking which seems to be still putting a lot of the eggs in that single beta site example.

I think that there has been, while well-intentioned things like EnergyStar and lead certification, but the thinking has not been broad enough, expansive enough.

If you target that to those that are at-risk, you could easily spend $10,000 per child per year if you have effective intervention programs.

A lot has been said about a holistic approach. We are dealing with, as chairman of the Crime Subcommittee, how to deal with youth violence...