The question is, will we send a message that the United States will not tolerate the use of chemical weapons anywhere in...
The chemical weapons attack against innocent civilians in Syria is an indirect attack on America's security, with broade...
We are at a crossroads moment. A precedent will be set either for the unfettered and unpunished use of chemical weapons,...
Our silence would embolden Kim Jong-un, who has a large chemical weapons cache, and would send a message that we are not...
The decision rests with us. It is not political. It is a policy decision that must be based, I believe, on what we belie...
What we do in the face of the chemical attack by the Assad regime against innocent civilians will send a signal to the w...
Are we willing to watch a slaughter just because the patrons of that slaughter are willing to use their veto at the Unit...
In my view, there is a preponderance of evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Assad's forces willfully targeted civili...
Such heinous and immoral violations of decency demand a clear and unambiguous response.
We will either send a message to Syria, Iran, North Korea, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, and any other nonstate actors that the w...
The message is that he has been granted impunity, the freedom to choose to use the weapons again or force us to go throu...
If we do not answer Assad today, we will erode a standard that has existed for those 100 years.
President Obama is not asking America to go to war.
When someone kills and injures hundreds of children with a weapon the world has banned, we are all responsible.
Since President Obama's policy is that Assad must go, it is not insignificant that to deprive Assad of the capacity to u...
I will tell you there are some people hoping that the United States Congress does not vote for this very limited request...
Never means never.
If Assad is arrogant enough, and I would say foolish enough, to retaliate to the consequences of his own criminal activi...
