I miss your good advice that I remember with fondness, working with you when I was in that other body.
So then, in fact, if the collaboration is outside of the United States, you really don't have much ability to follow tha...
But I think we have to have a more sophisticated way in which we look at those that are handling the most dangerous of t...
We could have had 15 of you up there. My point is, there's 15 agencies that do have some responsibility.
Without objection, the full statements of all of the witnesses will be included in the record today.
These labs, they do extremely important work and we want to make sure there's a working ability to get the job done, but...
I think we all would appreciate having those lines understood.
I think that's very--that's the types of observations I think we need to take a look at.
The Commission to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction has suggested a tier approach.
Well, once again, let me thank all three of you for being here and the work that each of your agencies do.
Is there a uniform protocol for perimeter security if you're dealing with the Level IV labs?
Well, that's clearly inadequate.
As you know, we also manage the firearms check program for the FBI as well, and that is also a prohibiting factor for pu...
I understand that the authority is not there. The question is, should you have the authority?
I think, anecdotally, many of us have had the experience of people being disqualified from national security clearances ...
I also think we need to know, of all the people who registered, how many would have had to have registered for tier one ...
It's a pretty direct presentation of the risk factors that we confront.
I guess my concern is, I don't know who to ask the question for in the Federal Government as to, where are the labs? Are...
