I support H.R. 2105, and I thank the sponsors, including Mr. Webster, Mr. Lipinski, and Ms. Rosen.
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
The threats to the scientific enterprise in America right now are profound.
I strongly oppose the Science Advisory Reform Act, and, at the core, I oppose this bill for many of the same reasons.
We must be prepared to pay for what we value, or we will simply not accomplish the laudable goals of this legislation.
I will vigorously oppose these efforts every step of the way, and I urge my colleagues to do the same.
This bill is a transparent attempt to slow down the regulatory process and stack science review boards with industry rep...
This legislation would have the same effect as the Secret Science Reform Act: Limiting the ability of the EPA to use the...
If this bill were enacted, EPA could be crippled, and the result would be more sick Americans and more dead Americans.
I oppose this amendment. As I noted in my opening statement, I oppose the underlying bill.
A horrifying prospect.
The cosmetic changes that were made to the Secret Science Reform Act do nothing to address the larger issues.
I will be strongly opposing passage of each of these misguided pieces of legislation.
I'd like to request a record vote on this.
I understand and sympathize with the Chairman's desire to move cybersecurity legislation. Cybersecurity is a critically ...
I urge my colleagues to support the amendment, and I yield back.
I think Assange has done enormous damage to our national security. I would not be praising him under any circumstances.
What happens when the non-state actor decides that cyber offers an asymmetric advantage to them?
