This bill, the Nuclear Energy Research Infrastructure Act, would help address these challenges.
Unfortunately, under this Administration, critical science and technology investments at many of our agencies are under ...
This legislation marks another accomplishment in our continued collaboration to advance nuclear energy innovation.
I hope we can continue this bipartisan collaboration to authorize other vital research activities at the Federal science...
These upgrades are critical to U.S. leadership in fundamental science and are important tools for industry and universit...
I do support the transfer of this innovative technology from lab to the market. It's a good idea.
I strongly support the passage of H.R. 4376, the Department of Energy Research Infrastructure Act of 2017.
As grant proposal success rates at NSF and NIH sink to historical lows for some programs, we should be very wary of any ...
We must continue to push agencies on this objective.
I believe the evidence shows SBIR to be an extremely valuable program that we must continue to support and strengthen.
I feel an obligation to propose an alternative that can address these issues, not just oppose the current bill.
I think a more incremental improvement to the process would be more constructive.
Unfortunately, the approach the Majority has taken with H.R. 2809 may cause more problems than it will fix.
Unfortunately, I think the solutions provided in H.R. 2809 may cause more problems than they solve.
I just wish we could also agree that money does not grow on the trees at the NIST campus.
I hope that if we have the opportunity to negotiate a conference agreement, both bodies will see fit to provide NIST wit...
This makes no sense to me, and it makes no sense to many in the stakeholder community.
The other problem addressed by H.R. 2809 is in the area of commercial remote sensing.
