On the recordFebruary 17, 2011
Although I support Secretary Gates' call to terminate the Expeditionary Force Vehicle (EFV), I must unfortunately oppose the Woolsey amendment because it also seeks to cancel the Osprey program, whose termination I do not support. The EFV is clearly not a wise use of American tax dollars. It is 14 years behind schedule and estimated to cost 168 percent more than originally estimated. Because of these realities, along with the evolving nature of naval warfare, Secretary Gates, the Secretary of the Navy and the Commandant of the Marine Corps have all recommended that it be terminated--and it was not included in President Obama's FY 12 Budget. By contrast, after overcoming a number of operational and cost concerns, the Osprey has become a top priority for the Marine Corps and does enjoy command support. If I could split this amendment into two separate votes, I would do so. Since I cannot, I will oppose it and continue to pursue a deliberate, program by program approach to finding needed savings in our defense budget. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
Source
govinfo.gov




