It is now my special privilege to yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Pennsylvania, Kathy Dahlkemper.

I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Nevada (Ms. Berkley), a member of our committee.

Mr. President, for the Committee on Armed Services I report favorably the following nomination lists which were printed in the Records on the dates indicated, and ask unanimous consent, to save the expense of reprinting on the Executive…

I can close very briefly. This bill is meritorious. It deserves bipartisan support, and I hope very much it will receive it. We owe this to the people who have essentially followed the rules who are caught by a closing date. This is a…

Before I recognize the next distinguished gentleman, I just sit here. Even on a bipartisan supported bill, we get such partisan rhetoric. I hope everybody listens to it. It is now my privilege to yield 2 minutes, or as much time as he may…

There's no excuse, and so what was done under previous administrations, Republican and Democratic, should be done right today. I'm afraid you don't see that there's an emergency for the families, soon to be 2 million. And also, let me say…

I yield myself the balance of my time. I have listened to my colleague from Michigan who comes here almost alone, and I think those who vote ``no'' when they go back home are really going to find themselves basically alone, because those…

I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 5618. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from…

It is now my privilege to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Massachusetts, a distinguished Member, Mr. Rich Neal.

It's now my privilege to yield 3 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from New York, Charles Rangel. (Mr. RANGEL asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

I now yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Davis), a distinguished member of our committee.

I simply want to say to the gentleman from Texas he will have to go home, if he votes ``no,'' and give an explanation why he voted ``no'' when 113,000 residents of the State of Texas will have lost unemployment benefits by the end of this…