This is a fundamental shift in the way that we are doing business.

I believe I have an open mind regarding trade, but I have a very parochial concern.

I just think that the EU is by far the biggest offender with respect to agricultural trade barriers.

I believe that no country, altruistically, out of the goodness of its heart, is going to lower a trade barrier.

I said, 'You know, we think that that is trade-related, not health-related.'

I think we gave up the store a few years ago when we agreed to proportionate reductions of export enhancements.

We have got to find it--that is our job.

I think the WTO has attacked import quotas as things that need to be converted into tariffs over time.

They say now it is about a $1 billion industry. Over half is plagiarized, i.e., Chinese beadwork, whatever, plastic in place of turquoise, Kuchinas carved in Mexico, all that kind of stuff.

But I would encourage you to do the best you can. It is just kind of a mess to try to find what the Park Service should be accepting and what they should not.

I do not think anything in my experience has been more complicated than finding fairness in the parks.

Something sounds wrong with that. I think that might be what we call the law of unintended consequences.

Well, you may have to work with some of the agencies that are already in place, such as the Indian Arts and Crafts Board.

Then I can tell you, you have got your work cut out for you. It is a mess.

That sounds like something that needs to be defined or changed, too.

Concession management is a crucial part of our National Parks.

It is just a complicated mess, and since some of those crafts they call traditional but they are not, if you go back far enough in time.

I am pleased that a major portion of the fees from the contracts are to remain in the park from which the money came.