What if it does not work?

We have been doing this experiment now for a couple of years.

What we have done is change the rules...so that people are actually materially better off going to work.

My concern, and I appreciate what you just said, is hopefully it will work.

The idea that people would move into public housing and stay there forever was not what the original intent was.

So our intent was not to cut, and I do not think that we have cut.

Well, I do not think the only answer is more money, but the answer certainly involves money.

I would be doing better if this mike would stay put.

It seems to me, again, of course you can coordinate better, you can be efficient, you can connect people to the VA.

I think one of the reasons why welfare reform has been, by most people's judgment, a terrific success--not for everybody, but for most people--is that case rolls are down by half, and people who have gone to work are better off.

I have heard that a cut in the budget is not a reduction but an encouragement.

I believe that education is the cornerstone of our democracy.

I believe that guaranteeing every child... receives a high-quality education is really one of our most sacred responsibilities.

The legislation that we're dealing with is the legislation that has already passed the U.S. Senate, the Port and Maritime Security Act.

The private security forces have gotten an incredible amount of criticism in how they have done inspections.

When everybody's in charge, nobody's in charge.

Not to be an alarmist, but I could really take that boat from Bimini and hit the outer marker and just keep right on coming in and go right into the side of the QE II.

Is it a legitimate concern if an operator stares at that machine for 2 hours?